The Brits Heart Obama

A recent survey (click HERE for the article) shows that Brits have a crush on Obama--in a five to one ratio.

So, while I don't think this means much of anything, I find it interesting.

If you're thinking of this factoid from an argumentation standpoint, the folks working for Obama might try to use this point as a way to show that Obama can help restore the dignity and stature of America abroad. 

But, then again, the race for president isn't a popularity contest. Well, wait, maybe it is.

Uh-Oh

The article linked HERE indicates that talks between A-B and InBev have apparently become "friendly."

And the article also relates that St. Louis would still remain the North American headquarters (but for how long?), but they're going to oust some board members.

As much as I usually don't drink A-B products that often (if I'm going to drink an industrial brew, I'm more likely to quaff Old Style, PBR, Schlitz, or Miller High Life), I hope the takeover, if it happens, doesn't hurt St. Louis economically.

But I'm sure St. Louis no longer being the international home of A-B will take its psychological toll. 

Music Friday: "Travel On"

The link provided HERE offers a song from Tishamingo's latest album, The Point.

If you can get past the inane questions from "MoBoogie Mama" for the first part of the clip, you'll probably enjoy the song (starts about four minutes in, fyi).

I have the band's first two albums, and they're pretty good--kind of Allman Brothersesque.

Predictions: Final SEC Standings

As promised in the previous post, I'm providing my predictions for the final SEC football standings for this season.

SEC EAST

1. Georgia, 2. Tennessee, 3. Florida, 4. South Carolina, 5. Kentucky, 6. Vandy

Most of the media has an embarrassing man-crush on both Coach Urban Crier and Tim T-Bone, but Tebow's antics are going to catch up with him sometime. It's a matter of time before he gets sidelined from a concussion or a shoulder separation. Florida needs to replace a lot of defense too, but they'll have plenty of weapons.

I think Tennessee will be a lot better than people think, but UGA should navigate the East as champion and finish with one or two losses overall. The Evil Genius in Columbia has some talent to develop on the o-line, so I see the Gamecocks a year away from being a serious contender again. They could upset some people though, so it's spoiler mode once again. 

Both Kentucky and Vandy are in serious rebuilding mode.

SEC WEST

1. Auburn, 2. LSU, 3. Alabama, 4. Ole Miss, 5. Arkansas, 6. Mississippi State

Both LSU and Auburn have similar profiles: great defenses, solid o-lines, strong running backs, and questions at the QB position. Les "The Mad Hatter" Miles' penchant for questionable but gutsy decisions will come home to roost this year, so I expect the Bayou Bengals to lose some close games even though they might have the most talent in college football. Auburn will have a stout defense, and their spread offense will work well. They also have a favorable schedule, so that helps too.

And now Alabama gets its own paragraphs, of course.

As much as I'd loved to predict that Alabama will win the West, I doubt it will happen. I think the offense will be quite good, and John Parker Wilson must improve his accuracy and decision-making to get us to contend. The offense is now using its third different offensive coordinator in three years, so there will be some growing pains. But I gather that McElwain's offensive schemes will open up a more diversified passing and running attack (short to mid-range passing, screens, etc.). I welcome that.

The huge question mark for the Crimson Tide is the defense, the side of the ball that Coach Saban prides himself on. The down linemen will be serviceable, but the linebacking corps invites serious concern. Ezekial Knight will probably not be cleared medically because of heart murmurs. Jimmy Johns recently got kicked off the team. And Prince Hall has been in Saban's doghouse since he took over in Tuscaloosa. Three incoming freshmen (Harris, Hightower, and Upshaw) will probably log serious playing time this year, with one of two maybe being starters, which is usually an indication that a team is in store for a tough year. 

Saban has cleaned out the driftwood in the program over the past year--getting rid of people who don't want to work or don't want to participate in what he calls "the process." They've been processed off the team, and that has created depth issues.

Ole Miss was smart as heck in hiring Nutt, and I look forward to watching the Rebels beat the Hogs in Fayette Nam on Oct. 25. The Rebels will have a good offense, but that defense could be worse than Alabama's.

Both Arkansas and State are in rebuilding modes with the Razorbacks significantly changing their offensive philosophy, and the Bulldogs lost a number of good players, changed defensive coordinators, and still don't have much of an offense. 

College Football Predictions

Since any fool can pontificate about college football on the Web and many do, I thought I'd join in.

The usual suspects of pre-season magazines are out, and I thought I'd chime in with my predictions for the national championship since my shots in the dark are just as worthy as others'.

Later in the week I'll provide the predicted final standings of college football's premier conference, the SEC, if you're interested.

After checking out the pre-season mags, it's clear that the fashionable picks for national champions are either UGA or USC.

If there is a program that has the easiest road to the BCS National Championship Charade in January, it would have to Southern Cal. They're stocked with talent, and there are no major roadblocks in the juggernaut's way except for its home game on Sept. 13 vs. Ohio State. 

USC is a safe bet. I get it.

I see why UGA is getting lots of pub. Knowshon Moreno is a stud. They have a solid QB. And they have consistently recruited outstanding talent for years. But they play in the SEC where programs are notorious for beating up on each other. Also, the last two national champions have been SEC squads. I don't see a three-peat. SEC schedules will take their toll on UGA, Florida, LSU, and AllBarn (all legit national title contenders).

So I'm going to make a bold prediction: Mizzou will meet USC in the title game. 

While Tony Temple is gone, there is depth at RB. The offense will be much the same, and the defense will be strong. The first game is against Illinois, which is on the rise, but I'm still not a believer in the Illini beating them this year. The crucial test will be Mizzou's visit to Austin on Oct. 18.

So you read it here first: USC vs. Mizzou in the BCS National Championship Game.

Competing Strategies

In a needed change, both candidates for president acknowledge that human-induced climate change is real, but they have different plans for addressing global warming.

For an article comparing McCain and Obama's strategies, click HERE.

Well, uh, wait a sec...

I posted this afternoon about how the asking price for Harden would be too high and how I wanted Maddux back.

And then I turn on the tube to find out that the Cubs acquired Harden and Gaudin for E. Patterson, Murton, Gallagher, and Donaldson (a single A catcher).

The big if on this trade, of course, is whether Harden can stay healthy for the rest of the season, which he hasn't shown he can do in his career.

The Cubs lose a good prospect in Patterson. And Murton never got a chance under Piniella or Baker. I think it's some type of negative bias against redheads or something. Gallagher is a good prospect, but he's another guy who quickly got on Piniella's bad side, for whatever that is worth. I think he'll enjoy the spacious confines in Oakland.

Gaudin might be the real difference-maker in this deal. He's pitched well this year with a 3.59 ERA and 1.28 WHIP, so he could easily bump Marquis from the rotation.  I hope.

I Want Maddux Back!

With the Brewers' acquisition of Sabathia, the Cubs need to make a move.

The Cubs apparently have been talking to the As about Harden for quite a while now, but I suspect the asking price for Harden is going to too high. Billy Beane will want to make out like a bandit as he did when he traded Haren to the D'backs. 

Randy Wolf's name has been mentioned by various sources as an option, but I see nothing much good in acquiring him. And Jarrod Washburn? Ditto.

The answer is Greg Maddux. The Cubs never should have traded him in '06. 

That trade ranks as the second worst move of the Cubs in the 21st century. The worst was when Steve Stone was deposed as color commentator for the Cubs in '04.

BTW, #$%@ Dusty Baker.

The End of Silence

One of the slicks (as Dubya likes to call magazines) I get every month is the international magazine, Ode. This month's edition is devoted entirely to "silence," or more precisely our world's disturbing lack of silence or quietness.

The article, "Quiet, Please?," is attached (click HERE), and it provides a number of findings and studies about how the lack of silence or even just the lack of quiet can very detrimental to our physical and mental health. The article, at times, gets to be a bit of information overload for me, but it simply confirms a number of thoughts I've had for years:

I hate noise pollution from mowers and leaf blowers. They not only cause horrible noise pollution, they're also incredibly dirty because they're unregulated. The amount of CO2 they emit is atrocious. As the Union of Concerned Scientists relate (LINK), "the average lawn mower emits as much smog-forming pollution in one hour as eight new cars traveling at 55 miles per hour." 

While I own a cell phone, I detest having them go off in one of my classes, and conversations on them do invade public space. Added to that annoyance are the dreaded blue tooth devices that facilitate people walking down the sidewalk as if they've escaped from an asylum and they're talking to their imaginary friends because we don't recognize the ear set (for lack of a better term) right away. The worst is when you're watching a baseball game, and some fool behind the plate or to the side of the plate is on his cell phone (and it's usually a male) while waving and talking to one of his nitwitish brethren on the other line with inane questions such as, "Hey, do you see me?"

The plethora of folks plugged into their iPods disturbs me too. They're all plugged in, shoving out other opportunities to hear the beauty of everyday life: the wind blowing, leaves rustling, birds chirping, kids laughing as they play, etc. The iPod, in this sense, simply exemplifies how our country has a hyper-individualistic culture. We plug iPods into our ears. We drive our pods (cars) to work every day. We park our pods in our pods (garages). And we live in planned pods (houses) that look a lot like the other pods and focus on our our pod (family) while not getting to know our neighbors or going outside much. 

More than anything, I think I and others need much more time to relax and do nothing for a change: time to "recharge our batteries."

The Italian psychologist Piero Ferrucci said it well when he stated, "Our culture is suffering form an overdose of action and a shortage of contemplation. I consider contemplation a basic need; you even see it in animals. Just think about dogs and cats. You often see them starting off into space. I think that their way of meditation, their way of recharging their batteries. We have that need too. But we deny this basic, physiological need--as if an entire society were to forget to go the bathroom. That's serious."

We're number 1, for a while...?

Linked HERE is an interesting article originally published in American Conservative (which looks like a fine magazine, LINK) but then excerpted and published in the recent issue of Utne.

The article entitled "The Creativity Conceit" does a good job of making us look closely at some of the assumptions we have about so-called American dominance because, as is part of the author's thesis, "The wealthier a society is, the more inventive it tends to be," and people's belief in American "freedoms" making us an inventive country needs to be questioned.

Since China, India, and the EU are very strong economic players and our country is in hock to the Chinese, what this article strikes home to me is that American political leaders and American industry needs to get it together.

American companies are far behind in the "greening" (not "greenwashing," which they're good at) of products and producing green products. Japanese companies dominate the solar energy production market, and Danish and German companies dominate the wind turbine market. 

GM, strikingly enough, is going for it all in their program to create a very ambitious electric vehicle called the Volt (for The Atlantic's great article on that, click HERE), but an Norwegian company is already set to deliver on that good in the near future with the Think car (for that Car's corporate link, click HERE).

Music Friday: "This Land Is Your Land"

Here's my favorite song about America, Woody Guthrie singing "This Land Is Your Land."

Click HERE for the link.

Have a happy Independence Day, everybody.

The First and Then Edited Version of the Declaration

If you've never had a chance to look at Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration with Adams and Franklin's editing, click HERE for a link to USHistory.org's photo of it with transcription.

This copy, of course, is the one before it went to committee. In committee the references to slavery were deleted, of course.

A-B to be Bought by Belgians?!?

Say it ain't so?

Is there any truth to this nasty rumor circulated by the fellas at Red State Update?

Click HERE for the link.

Clark's Comments

I don't like how Obama is distancing himself from Gen. Clark's comments about how military service doesn't necessarily qualify McCain as a good Commander-in-Chief.

I think Clark is right. In fact, opponents of Kerry's bid for President essentially provided the same argument--that Kerry's service in Vietnam doesn't necessarily mean he'll be a good President.

And just because Obama hasn't served in the military doesn't make him a unfit Commander-in-Chief. While there are many presidents who had past military service, others without military backgrounds--such as FDR--seemed to do okay too.

Maybe instead we could talk about substantive issues, such as national defense, the Iraq war, the economy, and others? Maybe?   

"Notes on Catch"

I thought I'd pass along this interesting but somewhat silly article on catch-phrases, stock phrases that are helping denude our vocabularies at an alarming rate.

Click HERE for the link to "Notes on Catch."

The catch-phrase I hate the most (and one not mentioned in the article) is "thinking outside the box." Who the hell ever thought inside a box? Is this cubicle-speak or something? Are there corporate executives in food courts across America plotting marketing strategies inside of refrigerator boxes? Whenever I hear someone say "thinking outside the box," I think to myself, "You don't know what the hell you're talking about, do you?"

That phrase has been played out, or has "played out" been played out? 

While this is not a phrase, I have been using the catch-word "liberate" from time to time. For example, "I'm wearing this Ole Miss t-shirt today because I liberated it from Diana."